The article Why China Will Democratize by Yu Liu and
Dingding Chen explains why they think China will democratize in the “near
future” – whatever that means (I guess if they don’t specify a date then they
can’t be wrong!!!). Some people have guesses 2015 (nice try guys) and 2025 (I’m
not optimistic) but I guess the Hong Kong protests last year would have made
the issue more urgent.
Economic
development
·
They
refute the usual performance legitimacy hypothesis because
1.
Other
states that have been economically successful, like China, have still
democratized eg Brazil, Korea (South, obviously), Taiwan (but this is really a
separate issue for China), Chile, Greece, Spain etc etc, notably during the
Third Wave of Democratisation.
2.
What
people want vs what the CCP can actually do. The government cannot do more
without more money, but where does the money come from? The people. A dilemma
alright. The three options of inflation, reducing waste and raising taxes all
have negative effects on the people, so would not really help the situation.
3.
Economic
growth may not be continuous – we have already seen China’s growth rate slow
marginally and this can threaten the stability of the regime.
·Inequality and Pressure for
Democratization
1.
China is
hugely unequal.
2.
This
causes resentment.
3.
The middle
class is become “neutralized” aka no longer pro-CCP.
The political culture
in China is changing.
· -Younger people are more pro-democratic
· -Domestic issues are a huge problem – internal
security spending is almost equal to military spending (!!!!!!) – this is huge
when you consider China’s military modernization.
· -Celebrities are promoting democracy
· -The media is even posting about the joys of
democracy
· -And of course, the internet (think the power of
the 500 million people who can access the internet = 125 New Zealands)
The change
· -Wen Jiabao gave off hints, but this could
just be to placate the people
· -This discourse can help hold the government
accountable
· -Some party officials are elected
· -Leaders have less power than they used to e.g
Xi Jinping
· -Foreign leaders perceive China negatively
because of the regime, and China wants to remedy this
· -The change will not be easy
Whether China will
democratise is almost impossible to tell. What Liu and Chen say is that the
people aren’t necessarily pro- CCP, but they are not anti-CCP either. The
protests last year in Hong Kong proved how little the CCP was willing to give,
yet the people are becoming educated and realising the benefits of democracy.
The economic growth figures are phenomenal, but most of the people won’t be
seeing this money, either due to corruption or living in rural areas, and this
may create hostility. If something were to trigger a movement, say, lack of
growth or taking back the ounce of democracy we see in local elections, then
perhaps we would see some steps forward.
The rise of China will
also matter hugely. Will the economy continue to flourish? Does China want to
be seen as hostile in the South China Sea? Does it want to be a hegemon in
Asia? Will it take back Taiwan? Will it continue to build its naval power? How
will China maintain its relationship with the US? Does it want to? If the
Chinese people saw China as being too aggressive, they may try to hold the
government accountable.
To me, democracy seems
a long way off in China. The government has a pretty tight lock around the
people, and most people are not ready to step out and say, “I want democracy”. It
looks like a long transition that hasn’t really begun. In order to democratise,
something will have to happen to set off a response among the people. From
there, the government may relinquish control an inch at a time.
This photo, although not entirely relevant is of a 'nailhouse' in China - people refuse to let their houses be knocked down and end up in the middle of big developments. Just google nailhouses and there are some pretty astonishing results. Some people are willing to oppose the government.
Also, for those of you have seen UP, - disney is more relevant than we knew!!!

Good summary, Immy.
ReplyDeleteDemocratization also seemed very distant in Eastern Europe in 1989, - even to participants - yet nevertheless happened. This doesn't mean it would happen in China - every place is different - but how could we tell whether China is sufficiently different? Is it that people are mostly satisfied with the CCP? Or that the CCP has learned new things from the fall of the Soviet Union (it is thought that the elite has studied this case pretty thoroughly, and have tried to avoid what they see as the Soviet mistakes).
Many more people than one might think are willing to protest against the Chinese government (see here https://dartthrowingchimp.wordpress.com/2015/05/28/in-china-dont-mistake-the-trees-for-the-forest/). And we do not have a good sense of when normal protest against working conditions etc. might blow up into something bigger!
I suppose we could say that the death of Konstantin and Gorbachev taking over was what helped end communism in Eastern Europe. That and the fact that it was just too expensive, and the Soviets could no longer afford to maintain it in the satellite states. I'm sure as you say that the Chinese elites would have very carefully studied what when wrong with the Soviet Union and how they will avoid this - does this mean that China won't make the same mistakes and therefore the regime will last longer? Economics could be a factor - although not in the same way as the Soviet Union, but if growth declines the people may become dissatisfied with the lack of success of the Growth First policy, and start demanding more accountability.
ReplyDeleteIt will interesting to see when/how/if it happens.