Was our dear leader too generous in applying his changes to censorship policy with retroactive effect. Our leader should have imposed the penalty as they stood at the time of the coordinated and systematic breaches of our glorious leaders sensible and wise censorship policy. (refer to an earlier post of mine on censorship) If our leader in his ultimate wisdom believes it to be apprpriate to retain the relaxed policy on censorship it should be applied to future instances with old actions being punished in accordance with the penalty at the time.
I do hope to see our dear leader restored to his previous position, with his cool hat. Hats are cool. (refer to earlier post on hats) Given the danger has passed and the time for opposition coordination has changed it may be time to consider rolling back on the concessions made during the abhorrent Pink whatever movement.
Long live the First Lord Of The Academia, Disseminator Of All Information That Is Accurate And Truthful, With Excellent Knowledge In All Things, Xavier Marquez and glory to the revolution.
Unfortunately, Samuel, your loyalty is unavailing and meaningless. While in one breath you pledge your undying allegiance to the "First Lord of the Academia", you question his actions in another. Is these common thoughts within the PURE party? Are there more internal problems than are being let on? I strongly question your loyalty to a leader that does not seem to hold the same sentiment towards you. While the Hot Pink movement did not at that time achieve the entirety of what it set out to do, would you deny that it made significant grounds in making fairer conditions for POLS209 students, of whom you are a part? It seems that you are biting the hand that feeds you. But fortunately, the Hot Pink movement has not announced that they are yielding just yet. So who knows? Perhaps you will reap the rewards of seeds that you did not plant or foster.
ReplyDeletehmm, considering this....
ReplyDelete