Wednesday, 1 April 2009

Bureaucracy as the real monster

In Robert Paxton’s novel The Anatomy of Fascism he examines many points that led to the rise of fascism. He pays special attention to the examples of Italy under Mussolini, and Germany under Hitler. On page 41 there is an outline of 8 main points that helped to ignite the movement that is fascism. Paraphrasing these points, he argued that the rise of fascism came about from an overwhelming sense of crisis, and duty to a higher power. He also argues that people must feel victimized, and the feelings of this victimization may lead to a fear of the decline in the community and the need for authority. Lastly he points to the seeming superiority of the leaders’ instinct and seeming beauty of violence, as well as the right of the ruling class to dominate all the others. These observations are very insightful yet it misses one crucial point. Although Paxton does express the importance of subordinates to these leaders he fails to capture the vast expanse of bureaucracy that must exist to create a Nazi Germany or a Fascist Italy. Hannah Arendt coined the phrase “the banality of evil,” when describing the trial of Eichmann in Nazi Germany. In Arendt’s opinion Mussolini was not a sociopath nor was people in his secret police forces. These people felt a sense of duty towards the higher powers which justifies them carrying out the atrocities that they did. If it were not for the vast hierarchies and bureaucratic machines that these two men created they would have not been nearly as “effective,” in carrying out their goals for their country. When Mussolini created the “black shirts,” and later the MVSN, he created a web of hierarchies where people were detached from their responsibility of carrying out atrocious acts of violence. This bureaucratic machine reduced the victims to less then humans, and was very effective in removing responsibility from individual soldiers. Everyone was just following orders coming from above, and therefore their subjects were dehumanized. Without the vast bureaucratic machine which helped to brainwash all of the people within it Mussolini and Hitler would not have been so powerful. This is why it is important to look at the modernized bureaucratic machine as a key reason for the rise of fascism.

5 comments:

  1. I agree with your point about the role of bureaucracy. Do you think that a bureaucracy in a fascist regime would be more efficient than in a democracy? If so, why?

    I think Paxton did mention the role of the bureaucracy, but only in passing. He was referring to the 'ordinary' people who made fascism possible through their support or lack of opposition: the public, the civil service, politicians, the police force, etc.

    Nonetheless, it is interesting to consider the bureaucracy as such a malevolent body.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not sure if it would be possible to state whether fascist regimes have more efficient bureacracies, as there are not enough examples. Nazi Germany however is renowned for its enormous and highly efficient bureaucracy. Then again, Germany as a democratic state is also well known for an efficient bureaucracy, so perhaps this is more universally a German thing rather than a Fascist thing.

    As another example, I would be fairly confident in claiming that the Italian bureaucracy under Mussolini was far more efficient than it was previously. Once again we have a problem though. Was this a case of Fascist Italian bureaucracy being efficient, or the previous bureaucracy simply being incompetant?

    Are not the civil service and police included within the bureaucracy of the state though? They may not have been beforehand, but under Nazi rule they certainly came under state control, and therefore a part of the state bureaucracy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Why would you think that the German and Italian bureaucracies were "efficient" during fascist times? What would you mean by the term?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think a much underated fatcor when it comes to the rise of fascism in europe between the World Wars was dissatisfaction of the Paris peace conferences at the end of the war. Germany lost vast tracts of land to France, Belgium, Poland and Denmark as well as being forbidden to reunite with Austria. Italy while gaining land out of WWI was annoyed because it got a lot less than what it was promised in the secret 1915 Treaty of London under which it broke the terms of its alliance with the Central Powers and joined the Entente with most notably what is now Rijeka in Croatia being a particular sore point for Italian nationalists. Also in Hungary which went to the extreme right if not quite fascism (Admiral Horthy the former head of the Austro-Hungarian navy was an admiral without the fleet acting as a regent in a kingdom without a king)lost large amounts of territory at the end of WWI including Slovakia, Translyvannia and areas of Yugoslavia.

    ReplyDelete
  5. "Everyone was just following orders coming from above, and therefore their subjects were dehumanized."

    How does bureaucracy dehumanize? Is being part of a large organisation, and feeling "a sense of duty", all it takes to participate in the repression and murder of others?

    Certainly this is a part of it (just go and work in a call-centre for a while and no doubt you will feel the urge to kill), but perhaps technocratic thinking contains in itself the seeds of destruction. Does the rational drive to know and control, taken to its extreme, dehumanize by treating everything (and everybody) as means rather than ends? Is the prioritisation of systematic process in itself an inhumane proposition?

    ReplyDelete