Wednesday, 8 April 2009

Pow Power Powerless

Vaclav Havel wrote a very insightful essay which helped to shed new light onto social conditions which make people feel powerless. His essay urges people to live truthfully rather then following blindly some empty ideology. This is a very good argument as every human being should be truthful to themselves and to those around them. That is one of the only decent human things which can be seen as universal. This idea of Havel’s regarding truthfulness and, humanity relates a great deal to German sociologists Max Weber’s two notions of the iron cage as well as the disenchantment of the world. In Havel’s essay he explores conditions is Eastern Europe which make people adhere to an empty and meaningless ideology. Because these people live their lives in a meaningless fashion, just to go by unnoticed it dehumanizes them. They lose genuine political interest and therefore do not partake in any meaningful political dialogue. This leads the masses to become disenchanted because this is just the way that things are, what can be done about it. The Disenchantment of the world inevitably leads these people to live in an iron cage of their own creation. By perpetuating these slogans and meaningless propaganda the people just keep perpetuating ideals which have no purpose but to sustain themselves and their ideologies. If people try to break free of the iron cage then they are seen as disloyal and irrational and are sent off somewhere to be isolated, put with other crazies, or worse. Although these consequences may seem dire, which is worse? Living a meaningless numb life and detaching yourself from everyone around you, or admitting to yourself the truth and suffering the consequences. Max Weber and Havel I think would both agree that being truthful is ultimately the righteous decision.

4 comments:

  1. What do you make of the idea that people in the Eastern European communist countries were "living a lie"?

    ReplyDelete
  2. People living in totalitarian or post-totalitarian regimes don't have a monopoly on "living a lie". We do it here too, even though there is no one forcing us at gunpoint to do so, and no one is legally censoring the media. Take cigarettes; everyone knows they are poisonous, we know who to direct the blame towards--the tobacco industry--and could do so without fear for our lives. Yet we still sell tobacco in shops to 18+-year-olds.

    It's hard to understand why we do this...Maybe the gun being pointed at our head in that case is (pretentious metaphor-time) one of social tradition. There's always something stopping people from living a truth, be it large or small; the violence of post-totalitarian suppression is just another point along the extreme end of the scale.

    Does that mean that living a lie can be a natural state of being? I don't necessarily think so, but would be interested to see what others think.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anne the Man, I'm not 100% sure who you are - could you e-mail me with your real name so I can assign points?

    Also, while hypocrisy and what the economist Timur Kuran calls "preference falsification" are not a monopoly of other regimes, I'm not sure cigarrette smoking works as an example; the people who smoke are not necessarily hiding their true preferences due to social pressure, no?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Being truthful may be the 'righteous decision,' but is it worth risking one's life over? Can one person really make a difference in this scenario, or do the masses need to collectively break free of the iron cage to truly make a difference?

    ReplyDelete